FAQ

Benchmarks

Question answering and reasoning benchmark datasets

The evaluation sets models are measured on — what each probes, and why contamination makes public scores drift upward.

These are the datasets models get scored on, which makes them unusually consequential: they shape what the field optimises for. They are also the datasets most at risk of leaking into training data.

Benchmarks in this category divide into knowledge tests, which ask whether the model knows something, and reasoning tests, which ask whether it can work something out. The distinction matters because a model can be strong on one and weak on the other, and because contamination affects them differently — a leaked knowledge question is simply answered, while a leaked reasoning problem may still require the working.

If you are using any of these to evaluate a model you are about to deploy, treat the public score as a shortlisting signal rather than a decision. Test items leak into web-scale pretraining corpora, and the only evaluation that fully resists this is one you built yourself and have never published.

Left, a radar chart comparing SuperGPQA, GPQA, MMLU-Pro and MMLU on axes such as discrimination, climbing space, number of samples, number of categories and correlation with Arena. Right, grouped bars for DeepSeek-R1, o3-mini (high), Doubao-1.5-Pro and Claude-3.5-Sonnet: each scores between 87 and 91 on MMLU but only 48 to 62 on SuperGPQA.
The same four models on four benchmarks. On MMLU they sit within four points of each other, between 87 and 91; on SuperGPQA they spread from 48 to 62. A benchmark is only informative while it still has headroom, which is why this list mixes the older sets with newer, harder ones. Image: SuperGPQA/SuperGPQA · ODC-By 1.0 (repository and dataset) · from “SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines”, arXiv:2502.14739
DatasetModalitySizeLicenceBest for
MMLUText15,900 questionsMITMultitasking abilities of large language models
SuperGPQA - LLM assessment on 285 disciplinesText26,529 questionsODC-ByLLM performance on multi-domain QA
SQuAD (Stanford Question Answering Dataset)Text100,000 questionsCC BY-SA 4.0NLP question-answering models
SNLIText570,000 pairsCC BY-SA 4.0Textual inference models
MathVisionImage3,040 problemsMITVisual mathematical reasoning in multimodal models
Qasper - Questions/Answers on scientific papersText5,049 questionsCC BY 4.0Read whole scientific articles
EXAMS - Multilingual school exam questionsText24,000 questionsCC BY-SA 4.0Multilingual question answering
DuoRC - Questions/Answers about movie synopsisText187,213 examplesMITExtractive or abstractive question answering
SelQAText404,776 rowsApache 2.0Answer-selection question answering
MAPS - Multilingual Agentic Performance & SecurityText805 tasksMITComparing AI agent performance
Licences in this shortlist — computed from the 10 datasets below. Amber marks non-commercial, share-alike or mixed terms.
Three grade-school maths word problems stacked one above another, each followed by its worked solution. Each solution is written as short reasoning steps with arithmetic shown in red calculator annotations, and each ends with a 'Final Answer' line giving one number.
Three GSM8K items. Each reference solution is a chain of steps ending in one final number, and grading checks only that number — cheap to score, but a right answer can hide flawed reasoning. Image: openai/grade-school-math · MIT repository · from “Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems”, arXiv:2110.14168
№ 01

MMLU

Text
Size
About 15,900 questions (14,042 test) over 57 subjects; ~114,000 rows with the auxiliary training set
Licence
MIT

About 15,900 multiple-choice questions (14,042 in the test split) spanning 57 academic and professional subjects, from elementary mathematics to professional law. The larger 114,000-row figure includes a 99,842-question auxiliary training set drawn from RACE, ARC, OpenBookQA and MCTest. The standard broad-knowledge yardstick quoted in nearly every LLM release.

What to train on it

Evaluating multitasking abilities of large language models, comparing performance across models on specialised topics, and building standardised reasoning benchmarks.

Source: innovatiana.com

№ 02

SuperGPQA - LLM assessment on 285 disciplines

Text
Size
26,529 multiple-choice questions across 285 graduate-level disciplines, JSONL
Licence
ODC-BY

26,529 multiple-choice questions in JSONL spanning 285 graduate-level disciplines, from law through to music. Far broader subject coverage than MMLU's 57 subjects, aimed at long-tail specialist knowledge.

What to train on it

Evaluating LLM performance on multi-domain QA, training or testing specialised academic models, and analysing robustness on questions from 285 disciplines.

Source: innovatiana.com

A stacked bar chart of the percentage of questions by error type for ten MMLU subjects, from Virology (43% correct, 33% wrong ground truth) through Logical fallacies, College chemistry, Professional law, Human sexuality, Business ethics, Formal logic, Human aging and Global facts to Machine learning (about 89% correct); legend: correct, wrong groundtruth, multiple correct answers, no correct answer, bad options clarity, bad question clarity.
A manual re-annotation of 100 questions per MMLU subject, here the ten with the most problems. In Virology 57% of the sampled questions had an error, with a wrong answer key in about a third of all the sampled questions; others have several correct options or unclear wording. A benchmark score is capped by the benchmark's own label quality. Image (cropped, legend moved): Figure 3 (first ten subjects) of the paper · CC BY 4.0 · from “Are We Done with MMLU?”, arXiv:2406.04127
№ 03

SQuAD (Stanford Question Answering Dataset)

Text
Size
Over 100,000 question and answer pairs, in JSON format
Licence
CC BY-SA 4.0

Over 100,000 question-and-answer pairs in JSON, built on Wikipedia passages where each answer appears verbatim as a span in the supporting passage. The reference extractive reading-comprehension benchmark.

What to train on it

Training NLP question-answering models, benchmarking comprehension, fine-tuning LLMs for assistants and search, and testing answer extraction or generation.

Source: innovatiana.com

№ 04

SNLI

Text
Size
570,000 phrase-premise/hypothesis pairs, JSON format
Licence
CC-BY-SA 4.0

About 570,000 manually labelled English premise-and-hypothesis sentence pairs in JSON, each marked entailment, contradiction or neutral. The foundational natural language inference corpus and a common sentence-embedding training signal.

What to train on it

Training and evaluating textual inference models, improving semantic understanding in NLP systems, and testing reasoning about logical relationships between sentences.

Source: innovatiana.com

№ 05

MathVision

Image
Size
3,040 math problems with images (3,344 rows including the 304-problem testmini split), 64 MB, Parquet format
Licence
MIT

3,040 visual mathematics problems (plus a 304-problem testmini split) in a 64 MB Parquet file, drawn from real competitions and each paired with a contextual image, spanning 16 disciplines and five difficulty levels. Competition provenance keeps difficulty high.

What to train on it

Evaluating visual mathematical reasoning in multimodal models, training models to solve problems using images and text, and testing across mathematical disciplines.

Source: innovatiana.com

SQuAD 2.0dataset/dev-v2.0.json · article “Normans”
context
The Normans (Norman: Nourmands; French: Normands; Latin: Normanni) were the people who in the 10th and 11th centuries gave their name to Normandy, a region in France. They were descended from Norse ("Norman" comes from "Norseman") raiders and pirates from Denmark, Iceland and Norway who, under their leader Rollo, agreed to swear fealty to King Charles III of West Francia. …
question
In what country is Normandy located?
answers
“France” at character 159 — given by 4 annotators
question
What is France a region of?
is_impossible
true — answers is empty; plausible_answers holds “Normandy”
A SQuAD 2.0 passage with one answerable and one deliberately unanswerable question. Answers are character offsets into the passage, and the unanswerable question comes with a plausible-looking distractor, so a model that always extracts a span is penalised. From the dataset: rajpurkar/SQuAD-explorer · dataset/dev-v2.0.json · CC BY-SA 4.0
№ 06

Qasper - Questions/Answers on scientific papers

Text
Size
5,049 questions on 1,585 articles, structured JSON (text, questions, answers, annotations)
Licence
CC-BY 4.0

5,049 questions over 1,585 full-text NLP research papers in structured JSON, with answers and supporting evidence spans manually annotated inside each document. Built for long-document QA where evidence must be located.

What to train on it

Training models to read whole scientific articles to answer questions, testing Longformer or BigBird on evidence selection, and developing scientific QA systems.

Source: innovatiana.com

№ 07

EXAMS - Multilingual school exam questions

Text
Size
More than 24,000 questions in 16 languages and 24 subjects (136,082 rows across overlapping configurations)
Licence
CC BY-SA 4.0

More than 24,000 high school exam questions across 16 languages and 24 subjects, including mathematics, biology, history and geography (row counts in the Hugging Face release are higher because its configurations overlap), with some items supplying context and answer choices. Real exam material rather than crowd-written questions.

What to train on it

Training multilingual question answering, evaluating cross-language generalisation, and testing educational models in a realistic context.

Source: innovatiana.com

№ 08

DuoRC - Questions/Answers about movie synopsis

Text
Size
187,213 examples, JSON text format, two subsets (SelfRC, ParaphraseRC)
Licence
MIT

187,213 JSON question-answer examples built from movie synopses drawn from both Wikipedia and IMDb, split into SelfRC and ParaphraseRC subsets. The paired parallel synopses force genuine paraphrase understanding.

What to train on it

Training extractive or abstractive question answering, evaluating comprehension across parallel passages, and strengthening paraphrase and generative answering.

Source: innovatiana.com

SuperGPQAdata/SuperGPQA-all.jsonl · line 441
question
The particle size range of soil physical clay is:
options
A >0.04mm · B >0.07mm · C >0.01cm · D >0.05mm · E <0.01mm · F >0.02mm · G >0.03mm · H >0.01mm · I <0.01cm · J >0.06mm
answer
<0.01mm (E)
discipline › field › subfield
Engineering › Forestry Engineering › Forest Engineering
difficulty
easy
One SuperGPQA item: ten options rather than the usual four, which pushes chance accuracy down to 10%, and a three-level discipline taxonomy that lets you report results field by field instead of as one number. From the dataset: SuperGPQA/SuperGPQA · data/SuperGPQA-all.jsonl · ODC-By
№ 09

SelQA

Text
Size
404,776 rows across four overlapping configurations (about 7,900 answer-selection questions), 68 MB, JSON/Parquet format
Licence
Apache 2.0

404,776 rows across four overlapping configurations (about 7,900 questions with candidate sentences), 68 MB in JSON and Parquet, each giving a question, a context and candidate answers from which the correct one must be selected. Answer selection rather than span extraction.

What to train on it

Training answer-selection question answering, evaluating identification of the correct response in context, and improving QA for virtual assistants.

Source: innovatiana.com

№ 10

MAPS - Multilingual Agentic Performance & Security

Text
Size
805 tasks, each in English and 11 translations (9,660 JSON instances)
Licence
MIT

805 agent tasks assembled from GAIA, MATH, SWE-Bench and ASB, each in English and 11 translations (9,660 JSON instances in all), for testing both the capability and the security of AI agents outside English. Fujitsu-published under MIT.

What to train on it

Comparing AI agent performance in multilingual contexts, testing robustness and security against adversarial inputs, and evaluating cross-language generalisation.

Source: innovatiana.com

An annotated example: the title and abstract of a paper called Quasar on the left, a question (which retrieval system was used for the baselines?) and its answer on the right, and below them three evidence paragraphs taken from sections 3, 3.2 and 4.4 of the paper.
One Qasper example. The question was written by someone who had read only the paper's title and abstract; the answer needs evidence from two different sections (3 and 4) of the full text. Benchmarks built this way test reading across a long document, not finding one matching sentence. Image: Figure 1 of the paper · CC BY 4.0 · from Dasigi et al. 2021, “A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers”, arXiv:2105.03011

How this list was put together

Drawn from the datasets in Dataset Finder filed under this topic, then checked by hand against what this page covers. A tag is a filing decision, not a description, so records that carried the tag without being about the topic were removed, and relevant records filed elsewhere were added. The order puts the closest fit first.

Sizes and licences come from each dataset's own documentation, vague wording included. Where we found a re-upload or catalogue card stating a licence that the original release contradicts — a CC0 tag on Flickr photographs, MIT on data whose terms require a signed agreement — the entry gives the original terms and says so. The comparison table abbreviates licences; hover a cell for the full wording.

Stop hunting. Start searching.

The datasets listed on this page are in Dataset Finder, alongside tens of thousands more — searchable in plain language.

Search Dataset Finder →